Archive for June 2011
The Monster Awakes.
It has been quiet on the Mythconception front for some time, but he is starting up again taking pot shots at other forums and their members. We must be in for another round of vitriol.
In a group of posts earlier this week one member at Mythconception headquarters took a shot at Hallam. The thread was closed after four or five posts then, it disappeared.
In the last couple of days Mythconception took a shot at Rupert of Oz about a post on PAP regarding the use of oyster shells in trickling bio filters. It was a difference of opinion, not much in it, except at the end Mythconception says this.
Rupert generally knows his stuff but he is, to some extent, constrained by the company he keeps. He could discuss his misapprehensions on this forum but he probably feels safer in environments where people know less…..and have less overall experience…..than he does. He may also sense that coming over here might be frowned upon by his patrons on other forums.
He , Mythconception, has obviously chosen to omit that Rupert of Oz has been banned from Mythconception HQ. Rupert of Oz disagreed once too often with the headmaster and was banned for life.
And the really funny bit, he probably feels safer in environments where people know less. It must be really hard and a great burden to carry, knowing everything Mythconception? Just how do you manage?
In this lengthy “he says, I say” post by Mythconception, he goes to great length to analyse every little detail and in a second “he says, I say” post he writes this,
Regardless of the design/type, nitrification will happen most effectively in a bio-filter where the sedimentary and suspended solids loading is minimised.
This is a simple, demonstrable and unequivocal fact (and one which is supported by the overwhelming body of scientific evidence)…..and the failure to acknowledge that is at the heart of the limited productivity and resilience applicable to basic flood and drain systems.
Once again the Mythconception person is making broad sweeping statements. All the scientific evidence is on his side. He knows just about everything and, it would appear that every flood and drain system has limited productivity and resilience. Says which scientist? Who? Himself?
We have pointed this out before, he makes claims and provides no evidence. His claims are, in every case designed to discredit others.
It would appear that this tactic will elevate him as the one and only true Guru.
